Happy New Year to you all todays game provided a pleasant start to 2011 in a game made more difficult by some strange refereeing.
Other than the ‘show in the snow’/Dancing on Ice this was the first proper call to arms in the league since the victory against Histon at a time when Wagner and Ann Widdecombe were still very much contenders. We had our own version of them running the line and blowing the whistle this afternoon.
We made one change to the York game with Dan Gleeson returning for Ed A-A and so the line up was: Tyler in goal, Gleeson Pilks Kroca Jakey Howells at the back. On the right wing Claude, with Keano and Drury in the middle and Amari Morgan-Smith with the bionic faceplate on the left.
Up front was Big Hips Danny Crow, who looks as if he had a very good Christmas (once again Santa refused to bring him an exercise bike) and MBH who had found his shooting boots over Christmas.
Before the game there was a minutes silence for the Rushden keeper Dale Roberts and inspirational former Luton skipper Terry Branston. The Kenny End was impeccably silent. No change there then I hear you cry.
The first half I thought we were a bit ring rusty, which I suppose is not really very surprising. But though we were a bit lacklustre at times we didnt concede a silly goal or anything like that and so made it easier for ourselves when we did inevitably pick up. Scoring the goal just before half time made a huge difference to our approach, confidence and performance in the second half. I think at half time Richard Money must have done a bit of reminding of what we are about, because after the break we played much faster football, much more on the ground and further up the pitch, and playing against a side who were now chasing the game made this much easier.
I wasnt sure what to make of Rushden. Clearly they came out all guns-blazing driven on by the loss of their teammate, but there is only so long that such resolve can act as your raison detre on the pitch without bringing results, and over time, without any long periods of
meaningful domination their resolve was diluted and finally diminished by the goals we knocked in.
The bloke behind me wasnt sure Rio Charles was playing, such was his non-involvement. He was largely anonymous which must have been hugely frustrating with him wanting no doubt to get one back at the club who let him go, but he was stuck out in left midfield rather than up front. It was somewhat surprising especially as their attackers seemed about as threatening as one of Santas little helpers and you would have thought that they could do with a Rio up front.
We made a bright start looking to knock the ball around nicely but mainly basing everything around balls up to Claude who had a strange day. Often on here I go on about the Claude you get on a particular afternoon depends on the roll of a dice roll a 6 and you get a world beater roll a 1 and you get Monsieur Disinterested not willing to go for anything or track back. Well today Claude confounded this theory a little by actually being both brilliant and frustrating at the same time. Hardly jumping for the ball on occasion but giving us a sublime finish on a disallowed goal. Not getting stuck in but supplying the cross for the opener. Limping around and looking to come off before getting a taste for it again and knocking the third in but more of that later.
We looked the best for the first 15 minutes without really carving too many chances out. The game was too crowded in the middle of the park and we were unable to get the ball down as much as we would have liked. I daresay Justin Edinburgh has made this point to them, let Luton get the ball down and knock it around and theyll murder you keep them frustrated by making them play head tennis and you still have a chance.
I have to give Rushden the epithet of well-organised which is a bit like saying a movie was well-filmed. They were hard working but not inspiring. Giving little for their surprisingly low turnout of away fans to cheer or enthuse about and thank goodness that we managed to quell the drum banger as early as we did.
The first major chance fell to Rushden, surprisingly, the clothes-peg seller Power demonstrating that he had the shot of a mule and bringing a good save out of Tyler.
I seem to recall we had a couple of sort of half chances shortly after Danny Crow with one of them and AMS the other.
Shortly after, what surely would have been the goal of the season (all five divisions) was sawn off by a flag-eager lino. Drury picked the ball up on the half way line and weaved his way in and out until he reached the edge of the R&D box whereby he plopped the ball in the path of Claude who accelerated onto the ball on the left and chopped a glorious right footed shot across the keeper Day into the right hand side of the far post. Oh what a goal that would have been.
From then on we seemed to overplay the ball on the edge of the box rather than putting a foot through it and whacking it towards the goal. Not quite overplaying to the extent we did under poor old Mick, but we took too many touches, tried to dribble it in on too many occasions.
Gnapka troubled only the man who fits the bulbs into the scoreboard after a good lay off by AMS.
Barnes-Homer having done all of the hard work in the inside right position cut inside and weakly shot straight at Day.
The last few minutes of the half really got the crowd going. Claude found some space on the right and played a great ball across the goal to find MBH to the left of the penalty spot. His header appeared to be mistimed because the ball looped off his head slowly, slowly, slowly over Day and into the net for the first goal. Perhaps this old cynic does him a disservice. In fact I think I do it was a beautifully cushioned and weighted header.
Into extra time in the first half Drury went on another mazy run, this time from his own half down the wing only to be met by Osano (I think it was). There was the briefest of contacts. Drury was the man with the ball and running forward, but in doing this somehow he managed to foul Osano accordingl to the ref. I must have blinked and missed it completely. What antagonised the home fans further was that Rushden forged a goal scoring opportunity down the other end from the non-free kick. Fortunately OConnor passed to Johnson in an offside position.
The half time whistle brought a volley of boos but not for the mighty Hatters but for the ref who made some random decisions (to use the modern parlance). He seemed to be over reliant on his linesman who was having a poor game himself. Never good to put too much weight on a broken crutch.
The second half brought out a different Luton team. Afforded more room initially by Rushden pressing forwards and not pressing us, but latterly in the half by us exploiting the gaps on the break. We found more gaps, played more one-twos and initially at least looked like the potential world-beaters we always do when the ball is on the floor and we are allowed to play. For about ten minutes at least Danny Crow, who had a fairly quiet first half bossed the attacking play and drove the ball around to either side of the pitch and through the defence bringing MBH, Claude and AMS on and into threatening positions. Claude fizzed at first then took a knock and switched off, then having run off the knock suddenly looked bothered again.
Of course the biggest sitter of the day fell to none other than MBH who was played through beautifully by Gnapka with only the keeper to beat and he managed to scatter the people in the upper tier of the Kenny.
Shortly after Rushden had their finest opportunity to make it 1-1, Smith I think it was picked up on a good pass by Gash (formerly of York and Ebbsfleet?) and sizzled the ball wide and slightly high of Tylers left hand post.
So typically of MBH having missed the sitter he then sticks away a much harder chance. Im delighted for him. I would imagine it would be so easy to knock your confidence missing an easy one but thankfully MBH seemed undaunted by it. Perhaps that is the difference between a striker and someone like Adam Newton whose season dissolved after missing the sitter against Southampton last January. Strikers get on with it. At least MBH knows he is always going to get plenty of chances playing in this team. Anyway Drury (or Keano, cant remember which) dinked through a lovely ball for MBH who held off a defender, stayed on his feet and finished left-footed past the diving keeper.
One comment on Rushden and Diamonds I havent mentioned is that there was some pretty brutal tackling going on in the middle of the park. I cant think who they might have coaching their first team there…a couple of cards were needed when I think only one was dished out. Another yellow appeared in the second half when Drury slipped and went under and was caught by one of the Rushden players flailing arms. In surely only the very loosest of imaginations was it violent conduct by the Rushden player. Having seen it from pretty close up if Drury hadnt slipped he wouldnt have had his head whacked. As it happens I think the ref chickened out by giving a yellow. It either wasnt violent conduct or it was. If it was then surely it was a straight red. Strange guy.
A good ball from Drury on the left went over the head of MBH but he wasnt going to allow that to defeat him today he tried a spectacular Brko-esque overhead kick which he connected with but which fluttered wide. Now that would have been a great goal if he had caught it right and fair play to him for trying. Though it wasn’t the case here, and perhaps this is the wrong place to put this comment Im all up for strikers being greedy. If a player can think he can get a goal for Luton Town by having a shot well thats fine with me. Too many seasons went by with us having strikers who would rather fanny about rather than try to stick one in, Id rather have a glory-hunter any day. And anyway if the striker can get the shot on target and trouble the keeper, then he will often make chances for his colleagues from blocks, deflections or cock-ups by the keeper especially at our humble level.
The third goal came in a slightly comedic way MBH put a ball into the box on the 6 yard line to the left hand side of the goal. It was such a good ball that he actually put two players in Danny Crow and Claude Gnapka they both muscled each other for the ball for a moment before Claude took the ball and carried on and fired the ball across the goal left footed into the side of the net. Much to poor Dannys visible irritation.
Off Claude went to do some sort of bizarre gay samba in front of the enclosure.
Rushden did come back at us a bit there was a brief period where they threatened to threaten, but it did strike me that for them it was one of those days where they could try to score all day but nothing would drop. One thing that did impress me was their crossing and corner taking. On more than one occasion a sharply swerving and in-dipping corner troubled Tyler (a bit like one of Jimmy Andersons deliveries troubles most of the Austrialian top order) on one occasion drawing out an excellent punch from MT which only went as far as a Rushden player whose shot was cleared off the line by Keano (I think).
Time yet for more fun, Day, the Rushden keeper picked up the ball outside his area but cleared only as far as MBH – who, had he been sharper would have lobbed him straight back over his head. However, he took perhaps a touch too many and did the non-selfish thing of trying to play Danny Crow in, but the ball was poor and by the time Crow had won the ball back, was only in a position to blast the ball over.
There were other chances by both teams, but I think I have got most of them. Ive managed to exclude a rasping shot by Dan Gleeson which went just wide where he had been found in space and drove forwards but it was a good effort and Gleeson had a sound enough game not sure what that says about either Dan or dear Rio.
And so onto the scores on the doors:
Tyler 7.5 handling was good, kicking was fair, rolled the ball out where he could, positional sense and communication is starting to worry me a little. I know it cant be easy having a Czech lump playing in front of you who probably doesnt understand everything you say but sometimes MT performances this year suggest that we saw the best of him last year. Im only talking fractions here of course, hes still a brilliant shot stopper and of course by far the best keeper at this level, but over time you come to notice these things. Nothing to worry about at present, but most players careers are somewhere on a bell-curve and perhaps MT has just started the beginning of the downward journey. Am I being unfair? Perhaps I am. I dont mean to do the guy a disservice.
Dan Gleeson 7.5 like I said above was tidy and had a good game and had a good shot.
Pilks – 8 I thought he had a brilliant game broke up what few attacks they had and was always in the right place at the right time.
Kroca 6.5 I watched him closely in this match. He was a bizarre mix of some brilliant tackles, some brave headers but some poor touches and passes. Par for the course at this level. Sometimes at corners he didnt pick up his man at all and presented more than one free header from crosses.
Howells 7.5 in the first half where the play was a bit stodgy Jakes abilities shone out like a beacon. Less so in the second half as we mainly attacked down the right and not the left. He was the sponsors man of the match which was quite amusing because whilst he did play well, and as you know I am a huge JH fan, Im not sure he did enough to warrant that today especially when MBH got two good goals.
Gnapka – hard to score really sometimes 3 sometimes 9.5. Overall perhaps 8.5 he did after all score a good goal and created the first one.
Keane 8 – all over the pitch closed down really well in the second half in particular and ran and ran and ran.
Drury 8.5 Id be happier if he was on the wing but there were some flashes of sheer brilliance from AD today.
AMS 7 looked very lively on occasion and overlapped repeatedly with MBH on the left so that MBH was often the widest player picking up the ball.
MBH 9 should have had a hattrick worked hard not a phrase you traditionally associate with MBH but was all over the pitch, particularly in the second half when the game opened up more. Unselfish in his passing and got a good couple of crosses in. The crowd has a dig at him when he doesnt really jump for balls played up to or over him, but who can blame him. Good header for the first goal and lovely finish for the second.
Danny Crow 7 seemed a bit anonymous in the first half, but came good in the first part of the second. Bit unlucky not to get any clear cut chances, mainly got bits and pieces and half chances from Claudes knock downs. Chased the ball when he lost it though and demonstrated a good work ethic. I think he was a bit cheesed off towards the end though but should put this game behind him. Big pressure on him now though with Jason Walker on the bench and MBH seemingly with a season-long berth up front. Lets see how he responds to the pressure.
Walker, Lawless and On fire Poku all came on briefly for their appearance money after about 90 minutes replacing DC, CG and AMS respectively.
Overall a good win. Id like to say we didnt really get out of second gear but that wouldnt be true we had to work hard in the first half and dominated large sections of the second half where I think we were pretty much in fourth gear. A sound enough start to the year, with no injuries or bookings and with the mighty Hayes and Yeading on Tuesday night which I will miss because Im going to be in Scotland. Certainly an annoying decision to move that from the bank hols to the Tuesday night.
And so, after the first game of 2011, our record is:
P21 W13 D3 L5 F44 A20 Pts 42 Pos 3rd. Two points per game is normally good enough to ensure 2nd place, but not usually first. However, this year with three teams pushing for the top place it is less likely that someone is now going to run away with the title and get 100 points. But let’s see.
Happy New Year everyone.